Netanyahu halts judicial overhaul after angry protests

One word is heard more often than any other on the streets of Jerusalem these days: democratia, or democracy. About 100,000 people sang, shouted and banged pots and pans outside the Knesset building on Monday afternoon, many carrying Israel’s blue and white flag. The demonstrators were tired; some had been up all night.

But after three months of unrelenting public pressure, the biggest protest movement in Israeli history achieved its goal: the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, finally announced a halt to his farright government’s judicial overhaul weakening the supreme court in a televised address on Monday.

“I am here today because I am worried about the future, what the future will be like for my six-yearold,” said Sharon Pelin, 45, a teacher from Jerusalem at the afternoon’s protest. “I am hopeful we can get the people around [Netanyahu] to make him stop.”

While leftwing Israelis and Palestinians have levelled criticism at the movement for defending the supreme court, which plays a major role in upholding the occupation of the Palestinian territories, the mobilisation of huge swathes of society is nothing short of remarkable. Demonstrations that began in central Tel Aviv on cold and rainy Saturday nights in January, just after the new government entered office, have evolved into a mass movement unlike anything Israel has seen before. On Monday, the 12 weeks of sustained protest culminated in a general strike across the country that closed hospitals and nurseries and grounded flights at Tel Aviv’s airport.

As evening approached, the demonstrators were joined by several thousand counterprotesters, mobilised by Netanyahu’s Likud party’s social media channels.

The strikes followed a night of unprecedented protests sparked by Netanyahu’s decision to sack his defence minister for opposing the judicial plans, and they build on significant pushback against the government’s plans from the military, Israel’s vital hi-tech sector and allies in the US.

Although the prime minister has reportedly been taken aback by the scale of the protests, and has been looking for a way to back down, he resisted significant internal and international pressure to delay or compromise on the legislation.

Proponents say the changes are needed to curb the powers of the supreme court, which plays an outsized checks-andbalances role in a country with no formal constitution and only one legislative chamber.

It is not lost on anyone that the proposals could help Netanyahu in his corruption trial, in which he denies all charges. Critics of the move say it will undermine democratic norms and the rule of law, allowing the far-right elements of Netanyahu’s coalition to press ahead with draconian measures limiting the rights of minorities, women and LGBTQ+ people.

Even as Israel grappled with nationwide upheaval, a parliamentary committee continued to push elements of the legislation forward to votes on the Knesset floor, and the farright architects of the overhaul reiterated their determination to pass the most important elements before parliament breaks up for the Passover holiday on 2 April.

For both sides, the fight is far from over. The compromise raises the spectre of new elections if the government collapses through infighting. Many Israelis would dread that prospect: voters have been evenly split over whether Netanyahu is fit to lead the country in five polls since 2019.