The Guardian Weekly

Smiley culture Behind the iconic face of rave

The smiley has been co-opted by ravers, artists and fashion designers for decades. So how does the 50-year-old company that owns the symbol keep it relevant?

By Will Coldwell

NICOLAS LOUFRANI, CEO OF THE SMILEY COMPANY, has sharp features, and a sharper grin. I find him in his London office, beaming energetically, clutching a poster that says: “Take the time to smile.” Around him, the room fizzes with iterations of the icon – you know the one. Fluorescent lights in the shape of that unmistakably simple, upbeat expression. Clothing, homeware, bottles of prosecco … all stamped with it. A basketball net boasts a smiling backboard to hurl a ball at. A bowl of fruit? Also happy. I spot a framed print of Vermeer’s Girl With a Pearl Earring, her face replaced with a yellow smirk. Nothing is off limits. The Smiley Company puts smileys on things. Last year it sold $486m worth of products.

Loufrani, 50, greets me with fast-talk and a French accent, steering me to a meeting room. We brush past employees in smiley-smattered harem pants, bearing MacBooks slapped with smiley stickers. They smile politely. We smile back. A fashionable young workforce busies itself at computers. Every season Loufrani and his team come up with hundreds of new concepts for smiley-based products and promotions and pitch them to brands. The Smiley Company owns the rights to the image in more than 100 countries. Yes, the smiley – at least, this particular version of it – is a trademarked image. Want to use it? You gotta pay.

The Smiley Company is ranked one of the world’s top 100 licensing businesses, with 458 licensees in 158 countries. It boasts thousands of products, from health and beauty to homeware. This year it celebrates its 50th anniversary, which means smiles all round; 65 new partnerships and collaborations. If you’ve noticed more smileys on the high street lately, now you know why.

“We do a lot, but we also don’t do that much,” Loufrani tells me. “We’re very, very protective of our brand. We try to be creative. We try to avoid having products with just a big yellow face.” To Loufrani, who has, in recent years, expanded the company to create a good news platform to promote charities and social enterprises, the smiley is not simply a logo, it’s a “movement”. It stands for “defiant optimism, positive thinking, empathy, doing good”. As the world simmers in these distinctly un-smiley times, Loufrani believes the Smiley Company has a lot to offer. Smiles may be down – according to the Smiley Company’s own smile index survey – but, thanks to a declaration by the company, 2022 is set to be the “year of smiles”.

Smileys have drifted across the pop-cultural ether since the 1950s. A yellow-and-black one first showed its face in 1961, when it was printed on a promotional sweatshirt by the New York radio station WMC A to promote a news-talk

It doesn’t have any negative connotations. I think it’s up there with religious iconography

show, Good Guys. Thousands were given away. But many people credit Harvey Ball, an ad-man from Worcester, Massachusetts, for designing the smiley in its most iconic form. In 1963 Ball was hired by the State Mutual Life Assurance Company to create a smiley face icon to boost company morale. He penned his design in 10 minutes. Two dots and a flick, though not without artistic distinction – Bill Wallace, executive director of the Worcester Historical Museum, has compared the imperfect slant of its mouth to the smile of the Mona Lisa. Ball was paid $45. The company produced pins with a smiley face on it, and sold millions over the course of the decade, though Ball did not trademark the design. Later, in 1971, Bernard and Murray Spain, two brothers who ran a couple of Hallmark card shops in Philadelphia, spotted Ball’s design, and copyrighted a version that combined the image with the slogan: “Have a Happy Day”, selling more than 50m buttons in the first year alone.

The Smiley Company itself harks back to 1972, when Loufrani’s father, Franklin, became the first person to register the smiley as a trademark – taking ownership of it as a commercial logo – which he did in France. His background spanned journalism, advertising and licensing. If you wanted to market a Batman product in France during the 1960s, Franklin was your guy. Babar the Elephant merch? Speak to Franklin. Licensing – when intellectual property rights are granted to third parties for a fee or royalties – was a relatively novel concept back then and Franklin hit the jackpot the following decade. Fed up with downbeat reporting and miserable headlines, Franklin pitched a new column to the newspaper France-Soir called “Prenez le Temps de Sourire” or “Take the Time to Smile”, along with a simple hand-drawn yellow smiley face to signpost goodnews stories. Through his company, then called Knowledge Management International, he licensed the smiley to other newspapers, then other companies and products. He made a deal with Mars, which stamped smileys on Bonitos chocolate pieces, then Levi’s, which whacked it on jeans. It turned out you could put a smiley on almost anything and sell it.

It can be difficult to imagine how such a simple icon could even be owned, but whether through genius or luck, Franklin had struck gold. The Smiley Company has fielded criticism for staking a claim to something so pervasive, but there don’t seem to be too hard feelings on Ball’s part. He died in 2001, but was “not a money-driven guy”, according to his son, Charles Ball, who told the Worcester Telegram & Gazette: “He used to say: ‘Hey, I can only eat one steak at a time, drive one car at a time.’”

To Loufrani it matters not who was first mover in the genesis of the smiley; the trademarking itself was tantamount to a creative act. “He invented it in the sense that he invented the business model of making smiley a brand,” he says. “Apple, Adidas, Puma, Fred Perry … a lot of trademarks are very simple designs. It’s not about who came up with the design, it’s about who decided to build a business out of it, to make it popular and to create values around it.”

Yet just as the use of the smiley in art, fashion and design has ebbed and flowed with social and aesthetic trends, the Smiley Company’s cycles of success have always depended on external forces. Franklin rode these wave after wave. He was unfazed by the shifting semiotics of a once-corporate feelgood logo into something often quite subversive. It was shrewd of him not to grapple for total control over its meaning. If anything, as the smiley was woven into the tapestry of 20th-century pop culture, it boosted sales.

Designed to deliver a simple feelgood hit, it soon became entwined with anti-war and anti-establishment sentiments – a 1970s photograph shows peace protesters assembled in smiley formation. Another depicts an American soldier in Vietnam with a smiley sticker on his helmet. In 1986, the artist Dave Gibbons depicted the smiley at its darkest, when he designed the artwork for Alan Moore’s comic book Watchmen. The cover depicts the smiley with a single drop of blood trickling across its blank, yellow face.

But it was the birth of acid house that sent sales stratospheric. The smiley first permeated the club scene after the designer Barnzley Armitage made a run of smiley T-shirts. The DJ Danny Rampling bought one and started wearing it in Ibiza. When Rampling launched his club night, Shoom, in London, in 1987, a flyer design featured smileys raining down like ecstasy pills. It was reborn as a symbol of utopianism for a new generation of ravers. In 1989, when the UK was in the midst of the second summer of love, Franklin’s business hit peak smiley. Loufrani was a teenager at the time. He’d hear about the deals his father was making. “The numbers were quite shocking,” he says. “I was seeing smiley products everywhere. He made one deal with a company to produce something like 40m badges.”

HIS EXPLOSION OF SMILEY CULTURE WAS SHORT-LIVED. By the time Loufrani took over, in 1996, the business was, as he puts it, “burnt out … crap … meaningless. Smiley was dead.” Rave culture was tarnished by negative press and scaremongering about drug use. Licensing deals disappeared as quickly as they came. “The prejudice became the excuse,” says Loufrani, “but the truth is the smiley was oversaturated. It just wasn’t something people wanted any more.”

Loufrani was determined to rebuild the family business. He took a different approach and began trademarking the smiley around the world (a notable exception being the US, where the Smiley Company settled out of court following a 10-year legal battle with Walmart, which uses the logo in its promotions). Loufrani also developed digital iterations that could be licensed out, such as emoticons. He tinkered with the design. Franklin wasn’t convinced. “He was shouting at me, saying: ‘Why are you changing my smiley?’” says Loufrani. “I always say: imagine you

were the son of Hugh Hefner and he asked askedyou you to relau relaunch Playboy, and you drew Bugs Bunny. It was like that.”

Just as a fleeting cultural nostalgia for the 1970s saw the smiley mainlined into the rave scene, it would take another wave of the sentiment to bring the smiley back into contemporary consciousness. By the late noughties, the 80s were back in vogue. Loufrani – who previously worked with the designer Ozwald Boateng and always had an eye on the luxury fashion markets – negotiated collaborations with the likes of Moschino, Armani and Supreme. His vision was to reposition the Smiley Company as a heritage brand, and the culture was buying into it.

The moment Loufrani really knew the Smiley Company was back on top was when the image featured in the opening ceremony for London’s 2012 Olympic Games. To the tune of New Order’s Blue Monday, hundreds of dancers assembled into a giant smiley, while giant inflatable smiley orbs rolled around the arena. “Suddenly at the highest level, from the British government who were organising the Games, the smiley was accepted as part of your heyday as a nation. It was embraced.”

WHAT DOES THE SMILEY MEAN TODAY? For Fraser Muggeridge, a graphic designer who has used it in his work with artist Jeremy Deller (independently of the Smiley Company), it remains a “universal symbol” for fun. “No one goes: ‘Oh, I don’t like the smiley face,’” he says. “It doesn’t have any negative connotations. It’s up there with religious iconography.”

Still, he was surprised to discover that the image maintains the power to provoke. When he and Deller were asked by Somerset House to produce a flag to fly above the building for its Utopia 2016 season (to mark 500 years since the publication of Thomas More’s seminal text), they landed on the image. At first, Somerset House was uneasy. “They were initially concerned due to the smiley face’s association with acid house, rave music and recreational drugs,” he says. “But once the flag was up and people started taking pictures of it and seeing it as a positive symbol, it stayed up for two years.”

Muggeridge remembers the smiley long before the birth of rave. “In the late 1970s and early 1980s I used to go to Sunday school and we’d get smiley stickers to stick in our Bible that said: ‘Jesus loves you.’ That’s a completely different vibe to acid house. The reason I thought it was good is that it always works.” He finds it strange that anyone can own its trademark. “Anyone can draw it themselves, make tweaks to it,” he says. “So in that sense it’s quite democratic.”

For Chelsea Berlin, an artist and author of the book Rave Art, the smiley has become one of those icons that has “smashed its way” through culture. “As soon as you put the smiley face on something people think it must be cool, hip, or related to rave culture,” she says. “But it’s seen as a historic item rather than a powerful countercultural force.” The commercialisation of the smiley by the Smiley Company, she says, mirrors the trajectory dance music has experienced since the late 1980s – subsumed into the mainstream and sold back to us. So what happens when an image like the smiley is dominated by a business like the Smiley Company? “It becomes Disney,” she says.

The Smiley Company may be a multimillion-pound operation, but at its heart is a fragility. Unlike Disney – one of its major competitors in the licensing sector – it doesn’t deal in a multitude of characters or worlds from its creative catalogue. It doesn’t really make anything at all. It’s just that simple symbol – and its value depends on a cultural consensus that is always in flux. As Michael Cherman, founder of streetwear brand Market, which has partnered the Smiley Company to produce a range of products, tells me, the challenge for the Smiley Company will always be how to keep it “as iconic as it is now”. Loufrani knows they have to be creative. His big fear is always that the company will end up back where it was in the mid-90s. “We need to adapt the smiley to the zeitgeist, to make it relevant,” he says.

Yet in an era of infinite replication, when images and logos can be shared and reimagined online in an instant, there’s always the possibility that the smiley could take on a life of its own, leaving the Smiley Company in possession of an image at odds with its values. It is already visual fodder for artists, many of whom have subverted its meaning, often to raise questions about conformity and consumerism. Banksy, for example, has placed smileys on the faces of armed police and the grim reaper. For the most part, creative use serves to reinforce the smiley as something iconic, expansive. But what’s to stop it being co-opted by darker forces? Pepe the Frog, an innocent character from a web comic, was appropriated by far-right groups and is now considered a hate symbol. Fleetingly, during the pandemic, anti-mask movement #SmilesMatter encouraged followers to wear a smiley badge to signal their views.

As I depart smiley HQ, I ask Loufrani if he is afraid that one day, people will look at the smiley and see something negative, unpleasant … sad … staring back at them? He’s philosophical. Like his father, he knows that the smiley’s power lies in it being used at all – even if the sentiment is ambiguous, or subverted. “It’s the same between our smile and a human smile,” he says. “It can mean different things to people. If someone smiles at you, you don’t know what’s on their mind. You might read it as happy … but they could be imagining you falling off a cliff.” • Observer

Front Page

en-gb

2022-09-30T07:00:00.0000000Z

2022-09-30T07:00:00.0000000Z

https://theguardianweekly.pressreader.com/article/282218014663834

Guardian/Observer